The Tale Review is CLOSED.
The presence of an article review in the site was considered essential a few years ago. However, in 2019, the prospect of finishing it has sunken into improbability. I believe that the time, effort, and enjoyment of the site's writers should be focused on new projects. The past, no matter how flawed, must be put to rest.
The Tales under its purview have been returned to the normal process of voting. The administration reserves the right to make the final decision on an Item's verdict.
Link to the checklist for items can be found here.
Link to Official Thread for Mass Review of Tales & Misc. Articles can be found here.
Link to The Reservoir, another archiving page, can be found here.
Legend:
- Keep As Is: The article being reviewed will be kept fully intact and without any major edits.
- Redeem: The general body of the article will be kept, albeit a substantial edit to description or report is to be made.
- Rewrite: A rewrite, big or small, is being called. Any author, including the original one, may do so. In the event that there are two or more rewrite proposals, the Mass Edit criticism team will review each and select one.
- Reimagine: The article's current form may be drastically altered; resembling the original version but with a unique change to the description / report.
- Retract / Discard: Practically means the same thing in this context. The article is to be removed from the main site, however, if the original author or a concerned user wants to keep the article offsite for rewrite / archiving, they will be allowed. An author may retract his works for his own use, and the Mass Edit team discards works otherwise.
Note of Etiquette: Unless otherwise stated, when an article has been favorably voted to stay in the site in some form, the automatic rights to Caretaker belong to the original author(s).
