Minimal Kontext said I could try. So I did.
I would like the 1'9 m in the header replaced by 1,96 m as well as the "1.96 m / 81.65 kg" with "1,96 m / 81,65 kg".
You keep revering to her as Object, but as far as I can tell she is a cooperative human. If that is the case we should treat her as such. There are certain human like structures that we can call objects, but this does not seem to be the case here.
Isurgency?
You are leaving potential on the table. This to me reads a bit to much like a character sheet, but that might just be me. You even have the beginnings of a story in there. Mysterious past is all well and good, but since she is cooperative we might get a lot more backstory out of her. If she has a key to immortality we should be after that. Can we just 1:1 replicate her patterns and the anomalous effect? Food for thought.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
I suppose the clinical attitude is a remnant from my SCP days.
Abaut the potential. Maybe you are right there is a place in here for a story but that was not my intention. Mostly because I detest the novelas that many SCP articles have become.
And I would rather leave the door open form many diffrent interpretations and ideas for her then just do everything here.
Like you said Food For thought and a Potential for many directions.
How did I tag this page? According to recent changes I did. Yet I did not. Please tell me that is an automated thing.
You most certainly clicked "Apply old license" in the drop down menu "User Guides". Meta put it there when we where upgrading to CC-BY-SA 4.0 and then left it there for reasons I can't quite remember but which likely were spurious.
I tagged this page. @LasNeonach just re-add the tag if you want to release this under 3.0 as well.
Eschew elucidation, espouse obfuscation.
The trick is that I still use the button and want as much of the new content as possible to also be under 3.0 to retain compatibility with SCP and the other related sites which still use 3.0.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.