A quick correction about SCP-CI history. Back in 2014 CI staff began a mass rewrite project and several pieces were deleted to comply with SCP quality standards. Following the rewrite much of the original community dispersed and even after that the CI-Wiki did not meet SCP's standards.

As for Cad, he pops in from time to time, usually just an upvote or a few posts every year or so. If you wait around long enough and his pattern holds you will eventually meet him.

Glad to see a new face here.

The reason we arent a sister site to the SCP wiki is that way back when CI started the site was below the SCP wikis standard, and there were no serious attempts to sororitice the sites since then. I dont think it will work today either.

As for Caduceus, no idea. I guess hes just, an adult now.

Have a nice day!

These are the item and tale announcement thread. Most people just use the per-page-discussion nowadays (which is the thread we are writing in now).

For the designations i was thinking in terms of this interpretation of our command structure. Having a General handle something that might compromise them seems dangerous. Letting Alpha personnel even touch the thing seems needlessly risky (if there is a touch effect). The Insurgency is no stranger to internal revolts. I thought the article implied that A-04 was already addicted to the item and working on a defection ("I read it."). Would not be the first time Fractal Music Box.

I think having something affect the mind is a dangerous, but compared to something like"Witching Well" which actually has caused loss of personnel in the past, the book has shown no indication of being that dangerous to CI-Personnel to the extend that admin staff has to sign for every use.

If i understand you correctly, it is the book and not its content that is anomalous? If so, a photocopy would have no effect.

Item’s activation is possible through simply reading it’s content.

This suggested otherwise.
I was thinking it was something like Bygone Jocundity, where the content is the anomaly and not the medium. If so, copies of the content would have the same effect as the original.

When it comes to the "recovery" I agree with you. I must have misread something in the usage section.

I would advise you to consult the Tag Guide and redo the tags for the page. Tags like "hope", "book" and "wolf" are already to specific (i suggest artifact and animal as tags) and while "cognitohazard" is in the terms page, the Insurgency uses the "mind-affecting" tag. There are a few more tags I would like to change, but i think you should try first.

I think there were some spelling mistakes in there, but before I go hunting for those I would like to have the content straight in my head.

I would not call it convoluted, I would call it either "incomplete" (I could not find a touch effect) or "suspicious" (why is someone under the influence of a mind-affecting artifact allowed to keep handling it and be able to write its deployment procedure in a way that keeps them getting in contact with it? Someone not addicted would not write "loss is not an option" into the document. The Insurgency has let go of great things when their cost grew to high).

In my mind Alpha Command should bother with direct threat to the organisation and not let lower ranks handle it but ok i will change it to probably like ''For gamma personel and higher only'' . Secondly, it just gives the exposed person maybe a vision and the effect of hope so you would open the book and then close it after some time with the large feeling of hope.

Thirdly i don't think that replacing a possibly religious cognitohazard or an artefact is doable. In the report it is clearly mentioned that Mrs. Olsen was recovered due to discovery of an annomaly which wasn't somehing CI planned as well… they discovered it, when Item is in use the person can be exposed and then item stolen by the Sigma opperative infiltrating the ranks of the gang/paramilitary since the effect doesn't end.
Lastly,
The runes should tranlate into ''Wolf smiles upon you '' and ''Wolf laughs happily'' or simmilar but due to using diffrent translators and Old Norse gramaticc rules it got messed up in the translation.

TLDR: I nontheless think the report is in a perfect state eventually if more people come to dicuss i will change the level of Apendix to Gamma (give or take might change or not). Additionally if i get it right is my writing to hard to understand or to convuluted? Would love to know,.
P.S: Thank you for checking it out and taking your time ;3

Also your link points to nowhere. Please post articles before linking to them.

I just saw your article. Usually when people post they announce it somewhere, be that under the file itself or the appropriate announcement page. That is usually done because sometimes the passive members just check the recent posts and not the front page.

For what this does I would not trouble Alpha Command. Usually when you get past Gamma this get world ending really fast. I also find it unclear weather the book is written in an easy to understand language or it translates itself. Your handling procedures require gloves, but I have not seen a contact effect in either description. I would also be interested in the effects of translations and photocopies.

If we can just print 20 of these we can let recovery fall to the wayside and have police deal with it. Worst case scenario the Foundation gets involved wasting their time and money and best case we might have a lot more Insurgence at our hand that have actual training by being criminals for longer.

I have also not seen why we should get people nudges over the edge and then immediately extract them. If we need to deploy items in the wild that usually means that we can not get to a target otherwise. Getting two guys in black suits some official looking badges is easier than actually extracting people already wanted by police. If we want these people to be criminals for us do to their position extracting them seems counterproductive.

As for the runes: I do not get the bed, smile or shine, but I appreciate the attempt. It has been a while since I had to use a translator for CI matters.

The file is save, but this looks like an author self-delete. Sometimes when people leave Wikidot they clean up after themself. There is no mention of it in the "deletions thread" which was still active around that time. Baronjoe removed it from the Arsenal on 25 Sep 2021.

Edit: The author of Tógálaí is listed as AtypicallyAzathoth in the Spanish translation.
The Chinese Never-More translation credits Doctor Xythinien, and I know Xyt had an alt account do to this thread. Xyt, is also known for deleting alts. Considering that Tógálaí is the squeal and both authors are deleted I am 75% confident to a attribute Nevermore to that user as well.

Meta, your thingy is, like, 33% written down. Should be finished in no less than 2 days because there is no drafting or anything invovled, only typing and SPaG.

Crayon man, I can't even. So my original idea proved unfeasible, so I basically pivoted to basically creating a slide show with a bunch of infographics for a CI orientation on [SPOILER], but I haven't figured out how to properly display it as an article. Like, apparently you can embedd PDFs, so releasing it as one would work, but gnaaaaaaaaarf.

Would any of this have happened if I had started before christmas' eve with working on the drafts?

…tbh, probably yes.

I never heard of the lamp incident (I was referencing something else). I also never heard of that sign, but I knew of 2 buildings that turn cars into mush when hit with sunlight from the right angle (which happens daily).

You are right with Stepford, but I never read the book or watched the movies. A lot of bad blood could have been prevented if the dudes just left their woman for the robots instead of attempting a replacement plot.

You can never have enough useful idiots, fallguys, alibis, cheep espionage and self-delusionists. Also it takes longer to make sure your brick did not hit a lawyer or a someone who would be missed by an employer.

I am working under the assumption that there is enough anomalous AI out there that has tried to be Skynet that fails because better AIs keep them in check. The AIs are people, people that are really difficult to kill or predict. I have seen enough code that should work, but does not to not trust them. For reference see self-driving cars that suddenly and for no apperent reason try to drive into oncoming traffic. The CI deals with AIs that range from "more than a machine, most likely" to "why are you not god, exactly?". Dealing with AI is like dealing with anomalous persons that also have their mind affected. Trusting that would reduces mission success.

Originally, the deceptions would not have been marked at all, but I wanted to show that something was going on with it. Would {} do the trick?

Honestly I'm not sure if many of the parts here are even deliberate references of yours or just a haunting case of art imitating life, but:

what counted as woman was as valued as a decorative lamp

Happened with the tech bros, of course.

A bird landed on a curve that might be a bench, before it incinerated.

I think the most likely reference to pop culture might by Night City's bird extermination act (Cyberpunk Roleplaying Game), but that in turn is based on real precedent, namely urbanites being just fucking menaces with a net negative contribution to everything that is good:
Wealthy Bristol residents cause uproar by installing 'anti-bird spikes' to stop droppings hitting expensive cars.
I'm also not sure what movie the line "WARNING: this bench becomes red hot between 2 AM and 6 AM." originates from (I can't even find a damn picture of it) but it's been around for a while.

The The Stepford Wives allusions are so strong I wouldn't believe you if you told me it wasn't on purpose. Or probably a flavour of overshooting counter-Geneshaft conditioning… (Wtf was Geneshaft even on about? I can't know whether I agree with its message until I figure out what it was in the first place.)

I agree that the Epilogue "twist" was very important. Of course we'd do something like that, especially since it is probably among the more ethical endeavours to achieve those ends (although I am not sure what we need spineless, detached males for; you could lob bricks at random in the city and you wouldn't hit a non-target).

On to gushing about great sentences that I especially liked:

• A good dystopia has teeth like a shark. Break out one and the next one will just slot into place in time.
• […] money flows, from the desperate to the deserving.
• Like a garden SiliconPeak grew men complicit with cruelty and great in self delusion, yet secretive and superficial
• If the mask slips we may assume ourselves lucky to have glimpsed the truth, but someone might have a plan and showing you a losing hand might just make you bet more. Do not assume to know all moving parts. Do not trust that you did not see what you were meant to see. Some are lying, some just do not know better and some have an interest in making you know what you know.

Oh yeah, you probably mean contemporary LLMs branded as "agentic" AI and not AI as a whole. I don't think the concept of artificial intelligence is something the CI would distrust. Unlike natural stupidity, a rational player is much easier to predict.

Oh yeah also you might not want to exclusively rely on colour to mark certain passages. Males frequently suck at telling colours apart (I think Tritanopia struggles with Blue/Green, but I'm far from sure here) but even disregarding them there's still issues for things like reading mode, narration (for the fully blind) or simply people wanting to print out your article suffering.

Now excuse you whilst I go rummaging for the plans regarding the aggressively parcouring magical girl SWAT team I shelved somewhere…

Anyways, how about we concentrate on one setting for our works so we can link them together. I know its kinda weird place but its commonly accepted that the GOC has like a semi Utopian city in the Atlantic ocean. That could fit.

Sadly I gave up on uploading the meme when I was not successful at the first try.

@Crayon: Your farmalization¹ stood out through its distinct lack of accompanying diagrams. Additionally, I am very certain Meta wanted a competent not a confident protagonist, whereas assignement attributed to be is way to succint to have that origin.

@Meta: I actually won't peek into your sandboxes until it's finished, kinda defeats the purpose of a present, doesn't it?

@Zesc: I am pretty confident in what I got for you, but seeing as I am shooting mostly blind here that might not count for much. I am still contemplating whether I let the sub-titles in as an esthetic choice. (I needed a fully structured approach to get something working and that is not usually how I write).

@Crayon man: I have not got my pen out just yet, but you already gave me a conflict about what "Having a Nice Day" actually means. I do have some ideas. Maybe it is time that I resurrect CI-Comics.

Crayon: Give the work a pretty presentation, preferably with pictures/audio and for atleast one person to have a nice day.
Meta: Wants to see a confident protagonist win
Zesc: Give the work an urban countercultural theme, exploring the difference between living in and living through it

So yes, I'd very much appreciate a detailed, printer-ready diagram.

The key to abridged series has always been exaggeration, not ridicule. Just that this is really hard with YGO because SHUEISHA/TV TOKYO is of the "I don't even know writers who use subtext, but if I did, they'd all be cowards"-variety. (Also can we talk for a bit about how Zuzu rides as passenger? That gives me more anxiety than any ME jump.)

Wasn't the ME WR heavily glitched and out of bounds? Or did you watch glitchless?

The only way I could make that work is something like Bioshocks Rapture, where the rich build a city far away from normal people problems.

I mean, almost. Bioshock (1&2, Infinite's political messaging was … messy) is a deconstruction of libertarianism. Or rather a parody? Because as shown, there's nothing deconstructing that idea faster than having it play out completely straight. I dislike that games as games, but as pieces of art? 10/10, no notes.

It also features the idea of an outsider perspective on the system, but they don't seem as much to outright reject it as the runners do with their off-the-grid living. Think about how your grind-fiction (Animemo? is that actually a term?) youths would engage with the world twenty minutes into the future, with an figuratively, and sometimes also literally, stratified society.

If you bear with me for a moment (I write, roughly 4k characters in), I think this has an interesting connecting with the concept of "liminality" as it was before the internet got its hands on it. Whilst the places explored are spatial close, if not identical, to the lifescape of the common populace, their social and practical roles differ greatly. And I think that's something that fascinates me and made me write this increasingly elaborate wish: the almost alien lens on the shared urban habitat, and the difference between living in and living through it. Third places become passage ways, whilst unpersonal off-limit areas necessitated by shrimple logistics become zones of freedom and expression.

Solid colors, no patterns (AI reality overlay?, some things change color to indicate intractability

It's called "runner's vision", and whilst being incorporated visually appealingly, it still remains one of the great scourges of the gaming industry, namely (rightfully) assuming that players are big dumb-dumbs that need everything traced out step-by-step for them. Mind you, the game was released by EA.

Haha, you though I would just go off the rails indefinitely? Think again! I have something on topic to contribute:

Namely that we need somebody (Crayon man) to contribute before we can start. I think "aim for the 24th Dec, with hard cut-off at the 6th Jan" is … reasonable. After all, this is an informal thing.

The only source on the list I am familiar with is 5DS, and the Arc V clip is so hammer on the head that I thought you send me an Abridged version.
I was actually hung up on

counter-cultural contrasting an oppressive near-future solarpunk dystopia

Solarpunk is not near future, dystopian or very "counter-culture contrasting".
The only way I could make that work is something like Bioshocks Rapture, where the rich build a city far away from normal people problems.

Good that you tell me now, because my "Mirrors Edge" research material (WR Speedrun) did not include that part.
These were my notes:

• Tall structures, wide open spaces
• Ineffective use of space (post scarcity or heavenly supplemented?)
• Only other movement is cars and enemies (no need to use streets?)
• even construction sites and Regeneauffangstruckturen are clean and white (new city, automatic cleaning?)
• Solid colors, no patterns (AI reality overlay?, some things change color to indicate intractability)
• Rats but no garbage or wall holes (Drones?)

with pride and without arrogance.

!!!
What? You didn't…

…look, next time I specifically wish for somethign without any oozy black sludge, then we'll see who has the last laugh!

I strongly recommend looking at the Mirror's Edge Catalyst artbook, it's both very pretty and summing up the setting neatly. But as I said, it's mostly vibes-based. I don't think that mentioning a colour scheme everywhere, or people's tats, is going to get you far. Although I really think urban GOC Ops can learn a thing or two from them.

It's mostly bout sticking it to the man in some semi-futuristic city that is basically a character in itself.

Never watched or played mirror's edge, so not sure how close I get, but I give it the old college try. I do remember parkour, white roofs, red shoes and an a girl with shoulder length heir on the cover.
I must go do some further research.

Timespan be damned, here's my wish:

I really crave Mirror's Edge vibes. Something that basks in the overlap between post-cyberpunk and grind fiction. I have no idea how to translate that into writing, but luckily it's not my problem. Something urban, counter-cultural contrasting an oppressive near-future solarpunk dystopia. Being in bed with the anomalous means having access to a world few do, and even in a crowded city you will be on your own. So you figure out how to work with that.

"how long ago was X" is an observer-dependent question

The question does not address the definition. From the "cosmic now" one person is now indeed ahead of the other, but they do not share the same now anymore. For them to communicate they need to resynce to a common point.

In short, the "plane of now" of observers in different frames of reference is not identical, as I previously mentioned.

Yes, but cosmic now does not care.

Assume two people get their clocks synced, than one gets slowed by relativistic motion, once they can again interact the clocks show different distances to the "first now", but in the process of re-syncing there is a time they both synce to, a "new now", for one person it would be 3 hours ago and for the other it may be months but they both sync to that time to share their now. The now of the clocks no longer matches the now of the communication. The cosmic now and the now of humans are different. Normal matter too resyncs their clocks by getting into an interaction.
Imagen the two stay in contact for the whole thing with all the frequency stretching that entails. One person talking slower does not break causality.

Sorry that I did not mention that part with different now's before. I should have.
I do not intend to say that there are no relative time-frames. I just wanted to say that there is an observer independent now, which can be measured independent of light-speed or time distortion.

I guesstimate that matter decays faster outside of time dilation.

With items I assume they work as written and than how it works breaks down once you try things the author has not accounted for. The item is hollow until cut open. With this item it becomes a question of "what did the makes of the beds define as human". The terminator needs to look human to go through time. If not sky-net would have send something better. The T-1000 is my main problem with it. Why not send a T-1000 factory? No, it needed to look human for narrative reasons. The terminator time-machine is actively restricted by it being a fictional element and not "real science". Breaking the beds is to me more about figuring out how far the narrative object can be stretched before someone points at it declaring "That's not how the force works."

An answer to the wrapping idea would be that the bed would need to make a detection of "not human" and than exclude the result from transport. The "text as written" does not imply such a function. From the standpoint of "good design" it can be argued that it should not work, but I would counter that there is no rule against it in the text and so there is no such exception. We should try standard ropes first though. If it does not take the backpack with, it will not take an other attachment that is even larger. Also, does the effect not replicate? We can just make the test beds and keep the originals. The standing order is to burn access, why not use it instead?

I want to keep it before the 31th so it can be labeled as a 2025 thing.
I say post the wishes now, we all try to hit the 20th, most missing the first deadline and than actually post by the 23th. Since there is no voting time we are done by the 24th.

I should have read the whole thing.

How about the 7th of January?

At its heart lies the concept of the Diaphor.

A metaphor is a figure of speech that suggests a likeness. A Diaphor is something far more potent: it is a tool, a principle, or sometimes even a contaminated object that acts as a functional bridge between two ontologically separate states. It does not just describe transformation—it enforces it.

Think of a cognitohazard that doesn’t just kill you, but rewrites your life story as a tragic sonnet in the minds of those who remember you. That is a diaphoric effect. A diaphor is the key that turns in the lock between “what is” and “what could be,” and our role is to forge, steal, and wield these keys.
The Department’s Preliminary Aims:

Cataloguing & Isolation: Identifying natural and artificial diaphors within our holdings and across the noosphere.

Theoretical Diaphysics: Developing models for diaphoric potency, transferential pathways, and existential risk.

Applied Transgression: Designing controlled diaphoric interventions. Want to turn a dictator’s heart into a literal stone? Not with mere magic—with precise diaphoric engineering. Want to translate a memetic kill agent into a harmless nursery rhyme? That is diaphoric translation.

The Diaphor Initiative: The ultimate goal: not just to use existing bridges between concepts, but to identify or create the Prime Diaphor—the hypothetical mechanism through which the fundamental rules of all reality are metaphorized into being. Whoever controls that, controls the substrate of everything.

We are the Chaos Insurgency. We do not merely break rules. We break the context of rules. We do not just cross lines; we redraw the map so the lines lead to our doors. Diaphysics is the formalization of this sacred work.

Those of you who dream in code that rewrites itself, who see narratives as systems to be hacked, who understand that a symbol can be sharper than any knife—I invite you to step through.
Comment below. Use secure channels. Bring your own metaphors. We have a reality to unstitch and reweave.

We do not fear the abyss between truths. We build bridges across it.

Basically: by the 10th, we all make a public wish of what we'd like to see in an article. Does not have to be a tag specifically but basically anything you enjoy. If you want landsharks, you shall receive landsharks. Then we all try to write something that satisfies as many other wishes as possible. The "other" is important, because otherwise we all end up with the same, identical crowdsourced prompt. Posting should be by 24th? 25th? 6th of January? Whenever the russians have christmas? Hell, now thinking about it, don't the japanese have some Tannenbaum-festival where they pin wishes to a tree?

Now, as I define it, is independent from light speed. It is not beholden to an observer. It is a distance from where something is now to the earliest point in time.
This distance might increase with different speed do to gravity, but every bit of matter has a distance to its creation. If two things have the same distance they share a now. How many nows there are depend on how small you measure and what is rounded together.

That'd be a good solution (and so awfully obvious we'd have to fire all physicists for missing it all that time) if it weren't for the fact that "how long ago was X" is an observer-dependent question (you could say it is … relative) and that's where it all comes crashing down.

Let me give you a quick counter example. You know how time dilates and "slows" down as you go faster? (And you better not question this, because besides gravity lensing it's like the one thing we have clear, fool-proof experimental evidence off. It's something that already becomes relevant in applications like GNSSs, so if you do, I'll be coming for your shins.) Now assume we have parties A and B, who meet up and sync their clocks. B is supposed to enter a spaceship moving at 99% the speed of light, and only leave after exactly one year. (The funny thing is they don't actually have to go anywhere, they can just fly in circles on the parking lot for all it matters.) When B finally leave their spaceship, according to WolframAlpha, roughly 7 years will have passed. Now if "the same time" is two objects at the same timestamp according to their own worldline, and they both have a miraculous device that can communicate instantaneously by this definition, you just broke causality. Because now A can walk up to B, tell them the lottery numbers from 6 years ago, B uses the device to instantly communicate them to A "at the same time" (which to them would be an A with the clock at 1 year) and we just committed lottery fraud that isn't illegal in any jurisdiction.

Now of course this is just a problem with your theory, and not general relativity. To understand that, I tentatively recommend Cool World's video on the topic (although you may want to skip unnecessary parts with SponsorBlock). Truth be told, it has it's flaws, the same ones like most explanations, namely trying to avoid scaring away the viewer with linear algebra¹, but it's the least bad I could be bothered to find on short notice.
In short, the "plane of now" of observers in different frames of reference is not identical, as I previously mentioned. It is unintuitive because human conceptualize the world in a different way, but the universe doesn't owe us to make sense.

There's only one "reversal". If you watched the video, you see that it happens when you cross over the light barrier, when the time and space axis "swap places".

Now to the actual philosophical concept of messing around with Items: the whole point of this is trying to "break" the Item and try to exploit its known, physics-defying properties, and not postulating new ones which end up restricting us to the "intended" use. I operate under the assumption that unless otherwise states, an Item behaves like a non-anomalous counterpart (although whether in-universe there were chances to confirm that is another question).

That out of the way I assume there is some cutoff as to what is still "human enough", and I'm not sure if a thin coat of spray paint suffices. To me this means the dead, top layer of your skin would probably already counter as a whole human, or if you need a nervous system, etc., perhaps a particularly gross teratoma. A person grafted into the container seems to be closer to, say, somebody with a pacemaker, an artificial joint, or even a pregnancy being transported.

HOWEVER, now I wonder whether we could wrap the human around the entire bed to include it that way? Or at least a second bed? That seems like a wonderfully elaborate way to permanently lose a bed.

Meta the Squirrel?!

Humans do something similar and just set now by how far you are from an arbitrary date. We both are in a now defined by our distance to the day we got this calendar.

Infinite speed to me means that there is no measurable difference of time distance between me being here and being somewhere else. Measured inaccurately it might look like I am in more than one place.

Time stops at light speed, but what I mend with "I do not know how many reversals are on the speed graph" is that if time reverses at light speed, but speed can be faster, it might revert back to normal time once you hit another speed limiter.

You must keep in mind that the Insurgency knows that there is stuff out there that can do the impossible. Just because we have to stare at the calculations in disappointment does not mean that they have to.

I think of reverse time more like a video tape you have on reverse. Things still look the same, they are just doing things that normal physics would find unlikely, like seeing a chessboard shake until all its figures are arranged in the starting position.

Why do a full human if we can turn the human into spray paint, keep that alive and than just spray a container?

"But does it scale?" is the ever pervasive, faux-insightful mantra of those to high on their own tech bullshit, and sadly some of it rubbed of on me. I'm so glad I could finally leave.

Anyway, I'm not disinclined in participating with this event, as long as it starts after my birthday in a week.

That squirrel seems squirrely, and not dead.

As for the cocomitance, it is not clear how these beds work across large distances. If we define "now" as the moment i throw my Rising Star in the air, our outpost at Rigel will only perceive "now" 850 years "later", and if they respond in kind, it will be the same time back. So picking targets might work differently - either the beds are connected through a shared frame of reference, or perhaps it's some sort of eventual-consistency asynchronocity, where A might appear where B was, whilst be takes the place of C to balance things out in the grand scheme of things. Probably allows some rather clunky time travel too.

And the flow of time "stops" not at inifinite speed, but at lightspeed. Anything after that should move backwards in time. (See the Tachyonic Antitelephone.)

I'm not sure an object with positive mass can actually experience this negative time though, at least it can not be "accelerated" to even reach the speed of light, let alone surpass it.

Personaly, I conjecture this is likely some sort of wormhole-esque shortcut, with the "phasing in and out of existence" implying a translation along a non-standard spatial axis. (Which interestingly means they might tunnel just through where the Phoenix Tank is currently stuck, huh.

Also I am fairly certain we can probably bioengineer a person with storage space/pouches in their body, All Tomorrows-style.

Sadly I don't know what I would want. Just shouting "Moving Shadows" to finally fulfill the bar of a canon is not how I want that to go. I could always use more "artifacts" and "locations" but those are as broad as wishing for clothes or books.

Planing scale before the prototype again? Even if it is just us 3 it could be fun.

As I understood it if you sleep on it you sleep for 8h and if within this 8h someone else is also on a bed they swap places within the 8h window over and over in random intervals. If that is true than we can just have 2 people in the loading dock two beds at all time, so if anyone wants to send something they just need to go in their bed and have a high chance of getting to their designation.

What is a human and how do we increase its storage capacity?
The cheapest option I can think of is a toddler without arms and legs but a lot of backpacks strapped to them. A bit higher up the chain is Human-Serum mini humans fused with storage crates. Ideally if the beds properties replicate we replicate them into some cartoonishly large mattress/steel-beams construct and have shipping crate sized transport with a human cell culture system bolted to the inside.

Load and unload does not have to be performed on the bed so we switch out the loading containers and can guaranty a permanent presence, bypassing the cooperation problem. Also a clock send with the device should be usable to sync times across space creating Chaos Insurgency Standard Space Time. Relativism stops to matter at instant speed, if I have understood it correctly, if time gets slower the faster you are than at infinite speed time would stop. Sadly it might be that if something is faster than light time goes backwards. Infinity is a lot larger than Lightspeed and I do not know how many reversals are on the speed graph.
How does anti-time de-age matter? If nothing is added will it just run on reverse entropy?

All of this was never intentioned by the author and I am here for it.

Interstellar travel might have problems with relativistic cocomitance, but I wouldn't see why not? As it's a swap, you sadly can't cheese it as much.

Bounty hunts are more or refinement of the initial bingo idea.

Besides the fact that proper, craptographcially secure, non-cheatable secret santa raffling has enormous potential for me engineering overkill, it has similar problems to the character-swap idea of mine a while ago: it's really frustrating if somebody can't make it.

If anything, I propose we do soemthing where everyone does something for everyone else: this either requires microfiction, or, much funnier, everybody writes a tag or something they wish, and the overall contest is everybody trying to write something with those tags. (This is doable as long as we assume typical turnout. In a wishful future with too many participants, we would group into groups of ~5 people at random.)

• Test interstellar travel
• Send Diplomats, who ever sits on the other site can read and write our language.
• Send invasion force, we might have to do a bomb in gut or terminator scenario.

Do the beds replicate or do they not? If they do why do they not replicate their fire resistance?
All force resistance, again?

How difficult is it to get someone that never had other tea to enjoy gold brew? (Californium brew might be to hard to get a starting sample.)

immune to all forms of force

This sounds like it could trap a god. Would said god be converted into tea? Could said tea be converted back into a god after we have someone who likes drinking liquid divinity, thus creating more divinity via water conversion?

Hope it is enjoyable. If you think it is tagged wrong I am open to changing it.

As for the 19th, its the date where the first few items were posted on this wiki.

• Have a nice day

Best wishes to you.

You just posting here once is more than most do. Welcome to the site.

Opens door. Pulls out 7mm drill, from inside pocket. Smiles. Closes door, refuses to elaborate.

What do you connect with the date? I do not recall a specific event tied to that day.

As much as I like presents I believe I might have trouble with that. My writing is pretty much a coin-flip on whether what I write is good and making it target adds another flip. If someone is willing to take the 25% chance of literary deodorant bottle for Christmas I am game.